Robin Hood (2010)
by Samuel Hadfield
“Rise and Rise again, until lambs become lions.”
Note: this review is based on the theatrical version, not the Director’s Cut
So, it’s obvious that there are a plethora of movies based on the hero of Sherwood, Robin Hood. Actors range from Errol Flynn to Kevin Costner. Now, we are given Ridley Scott’s interpretation of the story. Is it good enough to stand out of the crowd? In fact, Robin Hood (rated PG-13 for violence including intense sequences of warfare, and some sexual content) is a very entertaining movie, if you don’t mind the classic story being twisted. That’s right, this movie isn’t about stealing from the rich and giving from the poor, and King John isn’t even the bad guy. If that’s what you were looking for, prepared to be disappointed. If you want something fresh, you’re good to go for this is, “the untold story behind the legend.”
This story starts of in the Crusades and focuses on the star of the show, Robin Longstride (played by award winning Russell Crowe). Veering away from tradition, King Richard is slain in battle and Robin, along with a few comrades, escape into the forest, not sure where fate will bring them. They run into an ambush not meant for them and that leads into the rest of the story. The tale is pretty complex, but, as it turns out, Philip of France (Jonathan Zaccai) and Godfrey (Mark Strong) are plotting against John (Oscar Isaac) who has taken his brother’s throne. It’s funny because Godfrey is actually the keeper of the treasure. Anyway, the plot has lots of twists and turns, and unfortunately is difficult to follow at times.
Graphics wise, this movie is extremely well done. There is amazing scenery, outstanding cinematography, and very good effects. Ridley Scott and his crew are full throttle here. The acting and sound are also both superb. The ringing and clashing of swords is very realistic, dialogue is top notch, and fight scenes are intense and well done.
This isn’t the familiar “jolly good fellow” Robin Hood we all know and love, it is dark, gritty, and not for young children. However, it doesn’t have the stronger restrictions of Scott’s previous movies. The plot can be hard to follow at times, and it definitely isn’t the revolutionary breakthrough that Gladiator was, but this film was still a fresh breath of air that most viewers will find worth their time.

0 comments:
Post a Comment